Skip to main content

Table 3 Objective sleep (PSG) continuity and architecture with age as covariate

From: Clinical predictors of insomnia in borderline personality disorder: a polysomnographic and subjective examination

PSG

Predictors

Estimate (effect size)

Prob>|t|

TIB

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

7.9254229

-0.139942

0.0043448

0.0018018

< 0.001***

0.002

0.418

0.736

SPT

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

7.5835329

-0.125847

0.0021659

-0.000452

< 0.001***

0.021

0.733

0.943

SE

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

1.9670459

0.0056819

-0.001888

0.0007312

< 0.001***

0.478

0.049

0.441

TST

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

7.3734077

-0.072568

-0.00657

0.0018594

<.0001*

0.2390

0.3669

0.7980

WASO

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

0.9293893

0.0433207

0.0127706

-0.001065

< 0.001***

0.271

0.007

0.781

WASO latency

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

46.206184

-17.17147

-0.220011

0.1973801

0.033

0.007

0.766

0.790

Awakenings + Arousal index TST

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

13.30865

-0.816565

-0.0145

-0.196413

< 0.001***

0.202

0.847

0.010

Arousal index TST

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

9.6397899

-0.217223

0.0521119

-0.129773

< 0.001***

0.668

0.386

0.033

NREM arousal + awakenings index

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

9.7504104

-0.551853

0.0919221

-0.144238

< 0.001***

0.314

0.158

0.028

%N1 TST

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

7.08553

-1.803151

0.1711493

-0.001331

0.0042

0.0122

0.0431

0.9873

%N2 TST

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

34.825609

1.8845305

0.1822201

0.0048811

<.0001

0.0432

0.0973

0.9643

%N3 TST

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

36.99156

0.3116081

-0.365712

-0.036061

<.0001

0.7381

0.0013

0.7437

%REM TST

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

21.090505

-0.397545

0.011771

0.0307584

<.0001

0.5985

0.8951

0.7306

REM sleep latency

Intercept

Condition[0]

Age

Condition[0]*(age-28.72)

139.92008

-16.76697

-1.072099

0.0453885

<.0001

0.0073

0.1408

0.9499

  1. (RQ1.2) ***P < 0,001 ANCOVA analysis with age as a covariate, group as independent variable (condition 0 = healthy control group) and PSG sleep parameters fitted separately as dependent variables. Only significant predictors were reported in the table. The degrees of freedom for each ANCOVA model was 3, error (residuals) 81, and a total of 84. In bold, significant results